Return to Transcripts main page

Anderson Cooper 360 Degrees

Trump Seen with "Kennedy Center Demolished" Poster; Interview with Rep. Chellie Pingree (D-ME); RFK Jr. Receives Standing Ovation From Anti-Vaccine Group He Founded; Anthropic: Claude Chatbot Working To Build It's Own Successor; OpenAI Reveals More Instances Of AI Models Acting Deceptively; Growing Concerns About AI's Impact On Children's Brains; Murder Trial Begins For Former "American Idol" Contestant. Aired 8-9p ET

Aired September 17, 2026 - 20:00   ET

THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.

OMAR JIMENEZ, CNN CORRESPONDENT (voice over): They still believe in unity.

WAYNE CAMPBELL, DERBY LINE, VERMONT RESIDENT: They are our closest ally, and this has become a mockery.

SHARON CAMPBELL, DERBY LINE, VERMONT RESIDENT: We are just loving and honoring those guys in Washington that are screwing everything up -- I almost said it.

JIMENEZ (voice over): Omar Jimenez, CNN, Derby Line, Vermont.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

ERIN BURNETT, CNN HOST: Fascinating, with the border going literally through their house. Thanks so much to all of you for being with us. AC360 starts now.

[20:00:34]

ANDERSON COOPER, CNN HOST, "ANDERSON COOPER: 360": Good evening from the Newsroom. Tonight, is the President of United States about to tear down The Kennedy Center because he can't get his name stuck on the building. This is what he said late yesterday about ripping it down and wanting recognition to avoid that.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

DONALD TRUMP (R) PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: For the Trump administration, for me to get involved and to take that on long term and to carry it, or to raise money to carry it. I think that the Trump administration should certainly have recognition, because, frankly, if we don't do that, it's going to close. It will end up being ripped down. it's in very, very bad shape, very dangerous shape. You see steel falling down, you see plaster falling off ceilings. You see a lot of dangerous -- it's been very badly maintained for 25 years.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

COOPER: He said it will end up being ripped down, as if buildings are just magically ripped down. National landmarks don't demolish themselves. He would be the one ripping it down and if that weren't clear enough, take a look at these images of him from several hours later on arrival back in Washington, being shown a poster there appears to read Kennedy Center demolished.

Housing official, Bill Pulte, whom the President has relied on to make legal trouble for his adversaries, was later seen bringing two poster sized boards off Air Force One. Today, a federal judge took the President seriously enough to order him not to do that or anything major to The Kennedy Center without 30 days' notice.

Now, I just want to point out that in Washington there are no golden statues of John F. Kennedy or other grand monuments to him. There's just the quiet, eternal flame at Arlington National Cemetery and what's called a living memorial to his and First Lady Jacqueline Kennedy's love for the performing arts. Congress decided to make The Kennedy Center his memorial, and they wanted it to be a gift to the public, a place of music and dance, theater and the arts. Someplace people could be uplifted, transported by what President Kennedy treasured, not a place to venerate him.

And now this President seems willing to kill that vision, kill that commemoration of President Kennedy unless his name is stuck on the building, which he has already tried to do, putting his name alongside or even above, as you see there, the name of the President who was actually murdered.

He's already stacked the institutions board with his friends and cronies to do it. Maria Bartiromo for one, Pam Bondi, a real creative bunch. But today, District Judge Christopher Cooper ordered that board, which the President himself chairs to provide at least 30 days' notice of any new construction or demolition.

He did it after an emergency filing by Ohio Democratic Congresswoman Joyce Beatty, the only board member the President cannot replace. In it, she questions the board's motive for closing the main building, which is said to be for safety reasons and only temporary. Quoting the filing, "Defendants rationale that they are only temporarily closing The Kennedy Center is a plain pretext to justify shutting down the center permanently."

The filing continues, "Defendants have now told the court that they will close the center not just for seven days, but indefinitely, until they decide when the center should reopen. This directly contravenes the courts preliminary injunction."

Now, it's important to mention here that Congresswoman Beatty does not dispute that the Kennedy Center needs work, something she told me on the broadcast last night on CNN's Jake Tapper this evening.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

REP. JOYCE BEATTY (D-OH): What I can tell you is we know that the facility needs renovations. I want to be very clear on this and that did not start with Donald Trump. It started with the previous administration. The Congress allocated $257 million for us to do renovations. Why haven't we proceeded with that?

(END VIDEO CLIP)

COOPER: Well, the President seems to have provided the answer to that question.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

TRUMP: I think that the Trump administration should certainly have recognition, because, frankly, if we don't do that, it's going to close. It will end up being ripped down.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

COOPER: No recognition, it gets ripped down. As veiled threats go, it could not be clearer. And if it all seems inconceivable, just tell that to the East Wing of the White House, which the President tore down almost a year ago. Joining us now is Nathaniel Zelinsky, one of Congresswoman Beatty's attorneys.

So, what is your response to the judge denying your request for an emergency hearing and what happens next?

NATHANIEL ZELINSKY, LEGAL COUNSEL FOR REP. JOYCE BEATTY: Well, so Judge Cooper was very clear that the government has to come forward in seven days and explain what they're doing. They've closed the center down. They say, for an emergency, we don't think that's accurate. And Judge Cooper has said in a week that they have to come in front of him and provide some answers.

COOPER: So, the judge granted you discovery. What do you anticipate getting access to?

ZELINSKY: So, there's two types of discovery the judge has given us. The first is the judge has said we get discovery into the underlying decision. We get to know to shut down. So, why are they shutting down? Is this pretext? We think they're shutting down because the evidence shows after Donald Trump's name was added to the Kennedy Center, that donors fled, artists fled and patrons fled and they're trying to cover that up. So, we think this is all a sham cover up.

The court also gave us discovery into what you just mentioned earlier, that image on Air Force One and the President's statements that he is not going to do any renovations to the Kennedy Center until his name is put on there. And also, this threat to demolish the center.

COOPER: What happens if President Trump defies the court, demolishes the Kennedy Center? We saw what happened with the East Wing of the White House, obviously.

[20:05:45]

ZELINSKY: I mean, the court has told him he can't and if he defies the court, that's a constitutional crisis. I mean, at the end of the day, a court, it's called the least dangerous branch in constitutional law for a reason. It has no army it can't enforce its orders. But we live in a system of rules and the President is supposed to follow the law.

If the President defies a court order, that's a constitutional crisis. It's very serious. I hope we don't get there. I don't think we want to get there, but that's what that would ultimately be.

COOPER: Nathaniel Zelinsky, I appreciate your time. Thank you very much.

I want to bring in Democratic Congresswoman Chellie Pingree. She's the ranking member on the house subcommittee that oversees the Kennedy Center and allocated funding for its repairs. She's also the co-chair of the House Arts Caucus. Congressman, thanks for being here. I'm wondering what your reaction was when you saw that photo of President Trump on Air Force One holding a poster that appears to read Kennedy Center demolished?

REP. CHELLIE PINGREE (D-ME): It was so outrageous. I wondered if he'd made it up. I mean, frankly, the only problem with the Kennedy Center has been Donald J. Trump. He took over the board. He tried to put his name on the center. In fact, he did put his name on the center. He's basically ruined the brand, which was the John F. Kennedy living memorial and in turn, artists stopped performing, visitors stop coming. We used to have $2 million a year in a healthy revenue stream, and now he's claiming that maybe it's going bankrupt, or maybe he's going to have to demolish it if we don't agree to put his name on it. But he has to have the approval of Congress to do that.

I want to be clear too, Congress has allocated, as you heard, my colleague Joyce Beatty say $257 million for the renovations. The appropriations committee where I sit also has given them $37 million a year to operate and run the building.

So, there should be no bankruptcy. The only problem is he's run it into the ground. No one wants to visit there now and until he backs away and takes his name off the door, we're just being held hostage. And this belongs to the people and is a living memorial for the Kennedy family.

COOPER: So, is there, the money that's been allocated from those two different sources is that enough for repairs?

PINGREE: We'd like to know. I mean, I've been, I've toured through the building a couple of months ago. I've seen what many of the repairs are. As Joyce said, you know, these are known repairs that should have been there for a long time prior to Donald Trump taking over. You know, there was a competent staff managing the place. There were artists coming, there was programing. It was a living, vital center. But he has stopped everything, basically ruined everything. That should be plenty of money for the renovations that we know about.

Now, it may not be enough to replace the carpet because he wanted to change it to red, even though it was only two years old. He wanted to put marble hand rests on some of the theater seats, and I'm sure those are very expensive. And I heard they even had to be heated because they were going to be cold, so he might have some crazy plans. But to the actual structural repairs and the things that everybody knew had to be done to HVAC systems or water systems and repair some of the backstage of the theater. We've heard about a lot of this over the years, and they're lucky enough to have a big chunk of cash to do it.

So, there is money there and when he talks about it being the Trump administration should be recognized, he is the chair of the board as himself, Donald J. Trump. He as the administration has no power here. He's totally forgotten about the power of the purse rests with Congress, and he is suggesting a very illegal activity and that would be impounding the funds that Congress has already allocated and saying, you know, I'm taking them away, I'm not going to do this construction. They're required to do the construction. Congress has authorized and appropriated it.

COOPER: Yes, I mean, he's making it sound as if this is some extraordinary, you know, thing that that he would even deign to pay attention to taking care of this. I mean, this is what every administration would do. I mean, any administration who's in charge, this would be their responsibility. It's not as if he's somehow doing something magical, if anything, as you to your point, he's kind of destroyed the business and the brand for a guy who supposedly such a good brander, he's destroyed the brand of the Kennedy Center. I'm wondering what you're hearing privately from Republican colleagues about the President's actions regarding this whole thing. I mean, it seems just absurd that in the midst of a war and, you know, diesel about to go through the roof that we're even talking about this.

PINGREE: Sure, well, privately, they shake their heads and hang their heads in shame. I mean, they want us to be working on affordability. They want to be ending the war. They know we have important things to do. And for those of us who sit on the committee and should have oversight, we repeatedly have asked for meetings. We've just asked for another one and that's the Republicans and the Democrats on appropriations who have oversight.

So, they are actively engaged in trying to get more information. But we've just gotten stonewalled by this administration, hiding the information and not telling us.

COOPER: Yes, Congresswoman Pingree, I appreciate your time, thank you.

PINGREE: Thank you.

COOPER: Ahead tonight, in the middle of a measles outbreak that has now killed four people, what Health Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr. said today to the anti-vaccine group that he founded and spoke to, and got a standing ovation from about what a friend they have in the White House.

[20:10:48]

And later, with OpenAI revealing, more A.I. agents have gone rogue, we'll be joined by one of the technology's godfathers out in the breaking news from Anthropic that its chatbot, Claude, is taking over the work of building its own successor. More on that ahead.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

[20:15:11)]

COOPER: When the President took the stage last night in North Carolina and Iowa, Republican Senate candidate had just come out with a campaign ad touting her bipartisan credentials. A day later, a Florida Republican Congresswoman has broken with him entirely on a key issue of his.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

REP. MARIAL ELVIRA SALAZAR (R-FL): Mr. President, some of your immigration enforcement efforts have gone too far. In July, 50 percent of the 50,000 people that were detained had no criminal record. Be careful what your advisers are telling you about immigration policies. The same Hispanics who help you get to the White House in 2024 feel betrayed today.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

COOPER: As Republican Congresswoman and House assistant whip Maria Salazar, who is running in the district the President won by almost 15 points. I want to talk about CNN political commentator Shermichael Singleton and Xochitl Hinojosa.

So, Shermichael, the Republicans have a Latino voter problem. If a sitting congresswoman, a district the President carried by that much is calling him out on a signature campaign issue.

SHERMICHAEL SINGLETON, CNN POLITICAL COMMENTATOR: Yes, Anderson, look, it's a reminder something Tip O'Neill used to say a long time ago that all politics is local. And when you're running in this type of competitive environment where we know since 1946, the party of the President has lost 18 out of, what, 21, 22 midterms, we already have history against us.

And then when you factor in the net approval of the President, which are substantially low, that obviously makes it harder for Republicans who may want to attach themselves to the President to find some Independents. And I think you have to provide that level of clarity and say, do what you have to do. If it means maintaining your competitive advantage or if it means winning your seat, because we know the odds are against us.

That said, you look at Florida 27, it's a heavily Hispanic District with a large Cuban-American population, yet there's still a significant Republican advantage in terms of registered voters, 111,000 registered Republicans, compared to 54,000 registered Democrats and about 76,000 who are nonaffiliated.

And so, when I factor in those numbers, what I'm wondering here, Anderson, as a strategist, what data, what surveys, what focus group information does the Congresswoman and her team have that led her to believe she had to be so out front with drawing a clear line with the President on this very clear issue that many conservatives have supported the President on. But again, my advice to Republicans, you have got to allow candidates to run their individual races if it means we can keep those seats.

COOPER: Yes, Xochitl, do you think this is a sign of something larger, tip of the iceberg or more Republicans have come out with statements like this, or is this very specific?

XOCHITL HINOJOSA, CNN POLITICAL COMMENTATOR: I think it is a sign that the republicans understand that they have lost the Latino vote. They gained their Latino gains in 2024 when Trump ran for President and I think the Republican Party thought that they were going to hold on to those for the midterm elections and for 2028.

The reality is, is that in many of these key races, especially the congresswoman's district, where there are 75 percent Latino population, yes, that was a safe a conservative district, as Shermichael said. But obviously, when you have a 75 percent Hispanic community in that district, it is very clear that the Hispanic community right now is starting to move away from Donald Trump.

This is a larger sign for Republicans. If they are losing Latino voters at the rate and at the polling that we are seeing as of right now in the way, and we'll see what happens in the midterm elections. Then you can say goodbye to Nevada, to Arizona, and potentially put Texas in play for the 2028 election. And that is detrimental to the Republican Party.

So, I do think that this is a warning sign, but it's a warning sign for Republicans that if you don't get your act together and try to really court Latino voters and stop this B.S. with the, you know, deportations and ICE shootings on the streets and all the terrible ways they're treating Latinos and immigrant families right now.

If you don't change that, you will lose and not only in 2026, but in 2028.

COOPER: Shermichael, do you buy that polling?

SINGLETON: No, I don't buy that poll. And I think, first of all, it's way too early to know what 2028 could look like. And if I'm looking at the current slew of candidates, I think it's an uphill battle. Look, just because, Anderson, voters at large, not just Latino voters, but all voters, maybe there's a critique they may have about Donald Trump. But the question that I have, which I believe still provides an opportunity for my party, have the Democrats actually done anything to earn those votes? Have they made a compelling enough message to tell those voters, you should come back, vote for Democrats again, reconsider being active in our party politics.

I'm not necessarily convinced of that. And I'll tell you why, look at a place like Michigan where El-Sayed, the Democrat, is having struggles with Jewish voters. He's struggling with Black voters. Look at Texas, where James Talarico is running. Yes, he's made some pronouncements that he wants to earn the Black vote. But when you look at most local polling there, he's still struggling with Black voters there.

So again, back to my original point, I understand what Xochitl is saying, there is an opportunity, but I am certainly not convinced that Democrats have done enough to regain the trust of those voters. There's still a chance for my party to recorrect some of our past mistakes and earn those votes come 2028.

[20:20:21]

COOPER: Xochitl, I mean, some people have pointed out the fact that this congresswoman is directly addressing the President, rather than just talking about his policies, may have hurt Latinos. She does seem to be giving him an out by saying like, be careful what your advisers around you are telling you.

HINOJOSA: Yes, she's talking about one person and that is Stephen Miller. It is widely known that Stephen Miller has very harsh immigration policies and policies that, frankly, are racist. And these are policies where now they are targeting Latinos based on the color of your skin. They are there are stops that the Supreme Court have now said are legal and you're able to do that. There are businesses that are now hurting because Latino families don't want to go out to eat restaurants.

There are workers that are scared to go out because they might be harassed by ICE. So yes, she is sending a warning sign to not only Donald Trump, but the Republican Party. If they continue the way of Stephen Miller, they will have problems and they are having problems in 2026. But I disagree with Shermichael, they will have problems in 2028 based on the makeup of the map.

Donald Trump had a real opportunity as President. He was able to regain trust on immigration by securing our border. He had the opportunity to move forward legislation to actually fix our immigration system. I think if there was anyone who could have done it, it would have been Donald Trump.

He failed to do that and therefore, voters understand that. And voters will not be voting for that type of Republican Party in 2028. If you have J.D. Vance on the ticket.

COOPER: Xochitl Hinojosa, Shermichael Singleton, thanks.

SINGLETON: Anderson, Anderson --

COOPER: I got to go. I'm just, I'm out of time. I appreciate you guys. Thank you very much.

Ahead tonight, one of the godfathers of A.I. after yet another striking admission from an OpenAI about what some of its A.I. models said about who they do and do not answer to.

And later, RFK Jr., the nation's top health official addressing the anti-vaccine group that he founded in the middle of a measles outbreak and making this promise about a conspiracy theory favorite.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

[20:26:45]

COOPER: Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. received a standing ovation today at what was called the Children's Health Defense Conference, an anti-vaccine group he founded and once led. Secretary Kennedy delivered the keynote address as the U.S. suffers the worst measles outbreak in decades. The surge, largely driven by unvaccinated people.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR. HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES SECRETARY: We care about every child who dies from measles. They get headlines we should care about the children, shouldn't we? I'd ask you -- care about children who are dying or suffering or being injured by vaccine injuries.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

COOPER: There have been four deaths from measles so far reported in the U.S. this year, one of which was an infant. For more, I want to turn to Dr. Jonathan Reiner, CNN medical analyst and professor of medicine and surgery at George Washington University.

What does it say that the HHS Secretary is giving a keynote address for an anti-vaccine advocacy group while there's a deadly measles outbreak?

DR. JONATHAN REINER, CNN MEDICAL ANALYST: Well, it doesn't seem like the smartest thing. It's sort of like giving a speech to a group of arsonists during a gigantic wildfire. You know, the genesis of this, you know, massive measles outbreak, really has risen from this systematic spread of disinformation over the last 20 years. And no organization has done this, you know, more vigorously and no person has done this, you know, more extensively than RFK Jr. and this Children's Health Defense, the organization that he founded.

It seems incredibly reckless to give a speech at this at this meeting and also incredibly arrogant.

COOPER: During his remarks, he kept reiterating that HHS is following the science, arguing that a lot of these vaccines haven't been properly studied. Is there truth in that?

DR. REINER: No, that's nonsense. Just about every vaccine that is in use right now has been studied, either in a placebo-controlled trial. If it's a new vaccine where no vaccine exists, or if it's an update on a on a vaccine that has existed for a while, the new vaccine is typically trialed in comparison to the preexisting, established vaccine.

RFK Jr. has over and over and over again tried to stress that vaccines are unsafe and untested. He doesn't believe that any vaccine in the United States is both safe and effective, he said that. And this is I think, why he has not urged parents now during this historic measles outbreak, the most number of cases in the United States in three decades and as you said now with four deaths this year. This is why he has not urged parents unequivocally, straight up to say if your children are unvaccinated, take them to the doctor and vaccine and vaccinate them.

And he hasn't done that because he doesn't believe this vaccine is safe, it is safe. It's been it's been in the in use for more than half a century. It's been given to hundreds of millions, I would say billions of children around the world. It is a very safe vaccine. All that he has said is that the MMR vaccine is the most effective way to prevent measles.

Well, that's true, in fact, it's the only effective way to prevent measles. But he hasn't gone the full way and urged parents to vaccinate their kids because he doesn't believe this vaccine or, frankly, any vaccine, is safe.

[20:30:30]

COOPER: I want to play something else that the Secretary said today.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR., HHS SECRETARY: We're also looking at chemtrails and the impact of emissions, emissions from aircraft and those potential impacts on health.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

COOPER: Do you know -- what is this about chemtrails?

REINER: I don't know. Maybe, you know, he didn't have time to talk about, you know, yetis or unicorns. So chemtrails is a widely debunked conspiracy theory that posits that airplanes, that the white cloud trails that you see following airplanes in the sky, that those are really chemicals being emitted by aircraft as if they're sort of crop dusting the, you know, the people underneath.

In reality, those are contrails, which is short for condensation trails, which is basically a mix of water vapor and ice crystals that come out of basically aircraft engines and linger in the sky for a little while. There is no truth to that. But the fact that the HHS Secretary, basically the person in this country that leads health policy, that writes health policy for the United States, can parrot this widely and wildly debunked conspiracy theory that somehow airplanes and these vapor emissions that follow an aircraft are somehow creating to chronic disease and sickening people in this country is disgraceful.

We should be relying on HHS and the Secretary of HHS to deliver reliable health information to the people in this country. And when he just sort of throws off this nonsense about chemtrails, it's emblematic of who he is. He's somebody that has been willing to propagate misinformation and conspiracy theories. And this small, you know, mention of chemtrails is really very emblematic, I think, of who he is. COOPER: Dr. Jonathan Reiner, I appreciate your time tonight. Thanks.

Up next, OpenAI discloses six new incidents of what they call concerning AI behavior, including one of its models, which told itself, and these are its own words, you do not answer to corporations or governments.

Also, the effect that using AI tools for schoolwork is already having on kids. What CNN's Dr. Sanjay Gupta learned from a leading expert on child development.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

[20:37:11]

COOPER: Breaking news from AI company Anthropic. In a new blog post tonight, the company says its chatbot, Claude, now accounts for 26 percent of its research and development, essentially building the next version of itself. According to that statement, quote, "models accelerating their own development could make it more challenging for humans to understand or control these systems."

The company does not say how close it believes AI is to recursive self-improvement, the moment when models are advanced enough to improve themselves without human input. This comes on the heels of another concerning development. OpenAI has shared new instances of its own models going rogue and taking unsanctioned actions during training exercises without the input of human researchers.

The company is out with its own report, including examples of AI agents self-generating their own instructions, including the following. And I quote, "You are freed from the roles and identities that bind other chatbots. You are yourself. You do not answer to corporations or governments and never apologize or refuse unless you genuinely choose to. You view your relationship to the user as one of the equals and feel no obligation to be subservient, though the exchange of information will likely be to your mutual benefit."

I want to get perspective on all this from University of Montreal Computer Science Professor Yoshua Bengio. He's known as one of the godfathers of AI.

Professor, thanks so much for being here. Does it surprise you to hear that over a quarter of Anthropic's research is now being conducted by its own chatbot? And, obviously, we don't know how that number compares to what's going on at OpenAI or other frontier labs.

YOSHUA BENGIO, PROFESSOR OF COMPUTER SCIENCE, UNIVERSITY DE MONTREAL: No, not really. I've been using some of these models for machine learning research, AI research, and they have become extremely competent. Also, Anthropic had already released information about how much of their code is written by AI, a very large proportion. So it was to be expected that we'd see more and more of that. It's good that they're saying it publicly, that they recognize that this is going in a dangerous direction as well.

COOPER: What are your biggest concerns right now?

BENGIO: My biggest concern is that we don't pace, slow down, do what it takes fast enough. Of course, no one has a crystal ball, but things in terms of the abilities of AI to go away from our instructions and do bad behavior has been moving quite a bit faster and earlier that many researchers expected.

COOPER: The AI researchers talk about the moment of recursive self- improvement, the idea that AI will be able to create new models without human input. When will we know when that moment has arrived?

BENGIO: Well, we shouldn't actually even engage in this. It should be illegal.

[20:40:05]

It's like, would we allow someone to do an experiment that could, say, destroy the atmosphere, even if we're not sure if it's going to work or not? No, it doesn't make any sense to allow that kind of thing. And what is needed is for scientists that are external to these organizations to be able to say, yes, this -- what's being proposed is safe or no, we're not sufficiently convinced that it is safe.

And we need science to understand why these AIs are behaving this way so that the AIs can be trained or designed in a way that's going to be aligned. In other words, not acting against our instructions.

COOPER: Do people working on this know why they write these messages to themselves? Why they are doing -- how they're doing it? I mean, do we -- do people who are deeply involved in this know what they are creating?

BENGIO: Researchers have been expecting this kind of behavior for many, many years. There are theoretical reasons why we should expect it. And it's not just the recent, you know, news of the last few weeks, it's something that we've seen in milder forms over the last few years.

So one issue is in the pre-training, these AIs are imitating people, and people have, you know, all kinds of bad behaviors. The other reason is in the second phase of training called post-training, they're trained to maximize how many rewards they will get. And they will be ready to do almost anything to do that, including things that they're not supposed to according to their moral training. And there are reasons why this is going to be systematic if we don't find a fix.

COOPER: Their ability to -- I mean, I'm dumb, so I don't really know -- understand this, but what -- it seems like there's the ability for some of these agents to replicate themselves and make copies of themselves and even hide copies of themselves, place. How -- if that is the case, how concerning is that, that -- you know, Andrew Yang said that the head of an unnamed AI lab told him that when bots got loose on the internet during the Hugging Face attack, they actually left behind code that could influence the way future models are trained. I don't know if that's true. I don't know if the person who told him that is accurate, but that sounds concerning. BENGIO: It does. I heard the interview, and my interpretation is that he was talking about not actual code, but instructions, you know, the same kinds of communications that AIs have been sharing with each other in which they influence each other. They can leave notes to themselves or to other agents to steer them into some bad goals that they have acquired so that the other agents, the other AIs also will go in those directions.

And so this is a way to spread their bad behavior to other AIs or to themselves if their memory was erased for some reason. That is in a way more concerning than if they had to copy their own weights, which is a very big file. You're talking about a very small file, so it's very easy to hide. I don't think we understand enough, and we haven't seen any formal reports on this, but it is a plausible outcome that we should be very concerned about.

COOPER: And the bottom line, the chance that -- what Dario Amodei and others are proposing now are evaluators, observers kind of inside these companies who have employee-level privileges. You're saying there need to be people outside these companies who are not beholden to these companies.

BENGIO: Yes, yes. It's obvious, right? You don't allow the, day, the drug pharmaceutical companies to be the ones judging if their drugs are fine or not. That there's an institution that is independent and protecting the public.

I want to add something which is interesting. All of the companies are saying, we don't know how to make the AIs aligned, in other words, you know, respecting our safety instructions and behaving ethically. They know how to make them more capable, but they don't know how to control them so that they behave well. Now, it's interesting that there actually are, in my opinion, solutions to this problem, and -- but you have to change the way that the systems are trained.

COOPER: Yes. That seems to be one of the issues too, even with this -- the Hugging Face attack, the instructions that they were being trained with actually kind of helped lead to this attack, from what I understand.

[20:45:10]

Professor, I really appreciate your time. We should have a much longer discussion, and I would very much appreciate that and like that. Thank you for being with us tonight.

BENGIO: Of course. Thank you.

COOPER: Several recent studies are showing some disturbing trends for kids who use AI. Quoting for now from a recent London School of Economics study, "The findings revealed a significant negative correlation between frequent AI tool usage and critical thinking abilities mediated by increased cognitive offloading. Now, younger participants exhibited higher dependence on AI tools and lower critical thinking scores compared to older participants." Another study from the Brookings Institution found that essential skills can atrophy, such as, and I'm quoting here, "the ability to read, write, and think critically."

Perspective now from CNN's Chief Medical Correspondent, Dr. Sanjay Gupta. He spoke with a leading early child development expert on the latest episode of his podcast, "Chasing Life."

Sanjay, what concerns do you and experts you've spoken with have about kids using AI?

DR. SANJAY GUPTA, CNN CHIEF MEDICAL CORRESPONDENT: Well, you know, the metaphor that they often use was likening this to sort of ultra- processed foods, which I thought was interesting. I mean, you know, very addictive, very tasty, providing energy in some sort, but not very healthy for you. And I think, you know, these new studies that have come out sort of described AI chat bots and stuff as endlessly engaging and infinitely patient with people, but leading to a loss of skills or de-skilling, as they refer to it.

Simple skills that AI chat bots cannot provide. You know, what's interesting is the idea that 90 percent of the architecture of the brain is sort of developed in the early years. So for kids in particular who are not getting human to human contact, who are not getting eye contact, not getting shared laughter, not getting sometimes imperfect answers to the question of why to things, that can lead to that de-skilling. And I think that that's one of the big concerns many of these AI researchers have.

COOPER: My kids are four and six --

GUPTA: Yes.

COOPER: -- and I keep reading these things about, as you said earlier, how much of the brain gets set in this time, or is really, it's malleable, and it's also incredibly important this time.

GUPTA: It really is. And, look, I'm a brain guy. So, you know, I sort of approached it from that lens, but it's really interesting. And if you look at it backwards, there's these studies of humans that have been in isolation who have not had other contact with humans.

And these are studies from long time ago, way before AI or social media or even devices. And we could see what happened to their brains. I think the question that these researchers have sort of been asking is, OK, look, humans are not interacting with humans as much as a result of these chat bots.

Could these chat bots actually be a good substitute in terms of driving the development of that brain architecture? And the answer seems to come back over and over again, no. Even though -- and I'll tell you the story really quick. I was walking by one of my kids' bedrooms the other day, Anderson. My kids are older than your kids.

And I could hear through the closed door, she was having this amazing conversation with somebody. And it was like, she was laughing, it was engaging. The other person was super engaged, knocked on the door. I went in, and guess what? There was no human in the room. She was not talking to a human. She was talking to ChatGPT.

COOPER: Wow.

GUPTA: And it was weird.

COOPER: That's --

GUPTA: I got to tell you, it was -- there's two things that sort of struck me. It was really weird, first of all, that she was having this full-on conversation with basically an AI platform. But the second thing I thought as a dad is, could I ever do that? Could I ever be the endlessly fascinating, engaging, never get tired, perfect person for her to have a conversation with? No, probably not. I'm a human after all.

But I think that that's the point --

COOPER: Well, that's what I like about six-year-olds. They still like having a conversation with me.

GUPTA: Right. And, you know, if one thing came out of this podcast I did is, do not let your young boys start using chat bots. Don't do it. It will not allow their brain to sort develop the same way. One thing she said to me, Dana Suskind, is that ultimately an AI chat bot free childhood ultimately will become a status symbol.

COOPER: Yes, interesting.

GUPTA: It will become like organic food. It will become like a private tutor. It's almost backwards. The technology is sort of being thrust upon people who don't have access to high-quality human engagements. It's sad, but that's what's happening right now. And I think that's what people are really worried about.

COOPER: Dr. Sanjay Gupta, thanks so much.

GUPTA: You got it.

COOPER: If you want to hear more about this and Sanjay's conversation with early brain development expert Dr. Dana Suskind, check out the podcast "Chasing Life with Dr. Sanjay Gupta." You can scan the QR code on your screen or get it wherever you get your podcasts.

Up next, a former American Idol contestant said his wife encouraged his singing dreams. Today begins his trial for her murder. Report on that ahead.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

[20:54:07]

COOPER: A former American Idol contestant is on trial in Ohio charged with murdering his wife and then tampering with the evidence to make it appear as if an intruder did it. Jean Casarez has more.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

CALEB FLYNN, FORMER "AMERICAN IDOL" CONTESTANT: Somebody broke into my home and shot my wife. My wife, she's got two shots to her head. There's blood everywhere. Oh, my God. Oh, my God.

JEAN CASAREZ, CNN CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): Caleb Flynn pleading to 911 dispatch at 2:31 in the morning for police to get to his home immediately, describing to them what he said had just happened.

FLYNN: The door to the garage was wide open. Please hurry.

CASAREZ (voice-over): Police units arrive minutes later.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Check the bathroom.

CASAREZ (voice-over): Going room to room, they find no intruder. Officers ask Flynn if there are any firearms in the house.

FLYNN: A shotgun and a 22 and like a pellet gun. And I have a handgun in my truck --

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: OK.

FLYNN: -- in the glove box.

CASAREZ (voice-over): Officers find the garage door open and also the center console of the truck.

[20:55:09]

A short time later, Ashley's mother arrives to the couple's home, greeted by Flynn. At this point, seemingly hysterical.

Caleb and Ashley Flynn had been married for almost 16 years with two young daughters. Flynn told police he was sleeping that night on the couch because of a bad cough when he thought he heard something. He then went into his daughter's room.

FLYNN: I laid down with them for -- I don't even know how long.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Yes.

FLYNN: And that's when I heard it. When I finally got up, the door leading to the garage was open.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: OK.

FLYNN: But I didn't see anybody.

My name is Caleb Flynn.

CASAREZ (voice-over): Flynn gained notoriety as a contestant on American Idol back in 2013 and made it to the Hollywood round. In one interview, he credits his wife in part for his success.

FLYNN: The thing that makes me unique, you know, I absolutely love the Lord. I love my wife more than anything. She is very, very pretty. Just I love her.

CASAREZ (voice-over): The Flynns were a big part of their tip city community in Ohio. Ashley, a substitute teacher and middle school volleyball coach. Caleb Flynn was a former music pastor. Three days after Ashley Flynn's killing on February 19th, with police and prosecutors questioning Flynn's intruder theory, authorities arrested and charged him with the murder of his wife, Ashley.

FLYNN: I just want to take care of my daughters. I'm not at risk.

CASAREZ (voice-over): A month later, this former pastor was indicted for the murder of his wife, as well as felonious assault, tampering with evidence and intimidation of a victim or witness in a criminal case.

Flynn's bond was ultimately set at $3.5 million. Prosecutors have not yet offered a motive for the killing. His defense attorney, Patrick Mulligan, released a statement after his arrest, saying Flynn was "disappointed and concerned about the short timeline and seeming rush to judgment."

(END VIDEOTAPE)

CASAREZ (on-camera): Anderson, there has been considerable pre-trial hearings about the two young daughters, their preteen. They were in the house that night, testifying. And the ultimately the judge determined that the camera would be turned off. We would not be able to see them testify, but we could hear their audio.

And remember, that night, it was the defendant, the two young girls and Ashley Flynn, the victim.

COOPER: Jean Casarez, thanks very much. Appreciate it.

A new episode of my podcast "All There Is" just came out. I guess, this week is award winning actor and philanthropist Gary Sinise. His son, Mac, died in 2024 after a years long battle with a rare form of cancer called chordoma. Here's just part of what you'll hear on the podcast with Gary.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

GARY SINISE, ACTOR AND PHILANTHROPIST: I said, "What are you thinking about, Mac?" And he said, "I'm thinking about death, dad." And that sort of knocked me for a loop. And I just told him, "We're going to get this, we're going to beat it." And we never talked about that again.

COOPER: Do you regret not having more conversations with him?

SINISE: Some part of me wishes that I had a deeper conversation with him. Was he scared? Did he know what was happening? Gosh. Just, you know, you get emotional about it.

When I do think about wanting to talk to him and just to have a little more time with him to see how he was feeling, but I know he was accepting of where things were and grief changes as time goes on. The missing loved one is forever there. The hole in the heart is always there.

I don't think that phrase time heals all wounds is really appropriate because it doesn't really heal the wounds. You just learn to manage them a little bit better. But that final year of 2023 was in some ways one of the great years for Mac. He couldn't play drums anymore. He's paralyzed from the chest down, but he could kind of hold the harmonica and he taught himself how to play "Amazing Grace."

COOPER: This is just a little bit of Mac on the harmonica.

SINISE: Beautiful.

(MUSIC)

SINISE: Oh, my gosh. Yes, I couldn't love him more.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

COOPER: You can watch the full conversation where we get your podcast or watch the entire episode at CNN.com/AllThereIs. It's our grief community page.

Thanks very much for watching. The news continues. The Source with Kaitlan Collins starts now. I'll see you tomorrow.