Return to Transcripts main page

CNN News Central

Trump Slams European Allies As Greenland Tensions Loom Over Davos; At Least 40 Killed, Dozens Injured In Spain Train Collision; Manhunt Underway For Suspect Who Shot Indiana Judge, Wife. Aired 7:30- 8a ET

Aired January 20, 2026 - 07:30   ET

THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

[07:30:10]

SARA SIDNER, CNN ANCHOR: This morning President Trump is set to take his push for Greenland overseas. He's agreed to a meeting with the key players during his visit to the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.

As Europe lines up against his campaign to take over the Arctic island, the president is sharing his private messages with leaders, including this one from NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, in which Rutte says he is "...committed to finding a way forward on Greenland."

Joining me now are CNN political and global affairs commentator Sabrina Singh, and retired Army Major Mike Lyons.

Starting with you, Sabrina. Trump is revealing a text message from the French president and others where the French president says look, I do not understand what you are doing on Greenland.

So I guess the question is in Davos, how can diplomacy happen when you begin publishing another leader's text messages -- private communications?

SABRINA SINGH, CNN POLITICAL AND GLOBAL AFFAIRS COMMENTATOR, FORMER DEPUTY PENTAGON PRESS SECRETARY: Well, it's certainly an awkward start to any meetings that happen in Davos. I'm glad that -- I think the French president expressed his concern about what's happening in Greenland and reflects, I think, many Americans' concerns here at home as well.

We don't understand what's happening with why we'd want to militarily potentially take over Greenland or even buy Greenland. We have access to Greenland through this 1951 treaty that allows us essentially to open any base that we want and expand our presence in Greenland.

And I think for what it's worth if we expand or, you know, take over Greenland, that is going to come at an incredible cost to Americans. So the more cost effective way is increasing NATO presence in Greenland and in the Arctic region. I think we can all agree on that. But frankly, I think what the president has done by, you know,

releasing these text messages with world leaders is really set up a very uncomfortable conversation and also sort of getting in the way of diplomacy that really works behind the scenes in some of these meetings.

SIDNER: And Major Lyons, Denmark, which is responsible for Greenland's defense, has warned an attack on Greenland would all but end NATO and is expanding its military presence there. Germany, Sweden, France, Norway, the Netherlands, Finland -- they're all sending military personnel to Greenland.

I mean, these are all allies. What on earth would the upside be to take Greenland militarily since there have always been cooperation between the United States and Greenland?

MAJ. MIKE LYONS, U.S. ARMY (RET.) (via Webex by Cisco): Sara, there's no military solution for the United States to take Greenland and I don't see it happening on any level. It's all just performative action that's taking place by the president who I think his instinct is right that our Arctic flank is important and it has to be secured. He's not happy that NATO has likely ignored Greenland for the past 50 years or so.

But Sabrina is right that we have this capability to improve it and to put bases there if we like. We have that one base -- that space base there that performs our eyes and stuff.

But Greenland is strategically important and the president wants more U.S. involvement there and he wants NATO more involved in there.

But again, let's be clear. The United States is not invading Greenland anytime soon. The Denmark troops that are there now are trip wires. I don't see -- Article 5 would be completely out the window, and the NATO alliance is destroyed. So again, the United States is not invading Greenland anytime soon.

SIDNER: Sabrina, PBS first published this -- what Trump said in a text message to Norway's leader where he links Greenland to his failure to win the Nobel Peace Prize, saying in part, "Considering your country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped eight wars-plus, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of peace, although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America."

He then questions Denmark's rule over Greenland talking about there is no paperwork, and then says, "The world is not secure unless we have complete and total control of Greenland." And then ends with "Thank you!"

I mean, since the U.S. is the one that closed most of its military bases in Greenland, when you read that does it make you wonder if this is more about something else and less about security?

SINGH: Well, when you -- when I saw that and when I read that, you know, it was almost like a -- like a pull your hair out moment. It's like someone, like, throwing a tantrum in a text message.

And so, you know, I think when you read that, of course, it seems like it's about the Nobel Peace Prize even though, you know, Trump, yesterday, leaving the football game on Air Force One, tried to tamp that down. It's very clear. I mean, he was very clear from the beginning that this was a prize that he sought out.

So I think, you know, his ambitions for Greenland, while I agree with -- I agree with Gen. Lyons -- like, there's no reason why we need to take Greenland militarily, and we shouldn't.

I also think we have to remind ourselves that we have to take the president at his word. And you just look no further than, you know, some of the actions that we took in Iran and Venezuela. We have to take the president at his word and take him seriously.

[07:35:05]

So I hope at Davos that the temperature in the room can cool with European leaders meeting with him. Because ultimately, I think if the NATO alliance were to break up it only benefits Russia. This is exactly what Russia wants. You know, Putin wants allies fighting with each other. And so if we were to take military -- Greenland militarily that would be the end of the NATO alliance.

SIDNER: Yeah. It's interesting at the same time where Trump is saying this is a danger and they need Greenland because of Russia and because of China. It is a whole tangled mess that is probably not going to be worked out but certainly talked about in Davos.

Sabrina Singh and Mike Lyons, thank you so much. I do appreciate it -- John.

JOHN BERMAN, CNN ANCHOR: All right. And happening now, one major reaction to all of this. Look at stock futures down, and down sharply across the board. Investors are rattled by the president's language on Greenland, increasingly so.

So how is it playing with voters overall? Is this what they want the president focused on? Is he delivering the policies they actually do care about?

As part of his "All Over the Map" series, CNN's John King went to Iowa to find out.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

JOHN KING, CNN ANCHOR AND CHIEF NATIONAL CORRESPONDENT (voiceover): The Ebersole cattle farm, rural Kellerton.

KING: How are you?

SHANEN EBERSOLE, IOWA VOTER: It's good to see you.

KING: How are you doing?

KING (voiceover): Calving season before election season.

EBERSOLE: And then they'll calve in a pasture just like this. They're all of our old mama girls.

KING (voiceover): Shanen Ebersole speaks politely but plainly. There are signs of Trump-austion.

EBERSOLE: We definitely have choices. We can -- we can say calm down and we can say talk nice.

KING (voiceover): Ebersole was a Nikki Haley supporter but reluctantly backed Trump in the end. Three out of five is her first year grade. The economy feels a little better and illegal immigration is way down. But Trump's big Argentina beef bailout didn't feel so America First nor does talk about somehow taking Greenland.

EBERSOLE: I don't agree with that in any way, shape or form.

KING: That's not what you voted for?

EBERSOLE: No.

KING (voiceover): Ebersole's take on Washington, Trump picks too many fights. And people congress, she says, worry too much about money and power and too little about family farmers or finding compromise.

KING: You're open to voting for a Democrat?

EBERSOLE: Of course. I think that you have to vote for the person, um, that best meets your goals.

KING: The 2026 midterm stakes here in Iowa are enormous. The state is picking a new governor, a new United States senator, and all four of its House seats, of course, are on the midterm ballot.

KING (voiceover): Next stop, Des Moines and its fast-growing suburbs.

BETSY SARCONE, IOWA VOTER: There's that saying Trump was right about everything and that's kind of how I'm feeling right now.

KING (voiceover): This breakfast conversation, our sixth visit with Betsy Sarcone dating back to August 2023. Her shift, beyond dramatic. A DeSantis, then a Haley voter. Said she would vote for Joe Biden if Trump won the Republican nomination, but she changed her mind.

SARCONE: I think Biden probably changed me more than Trump. I think watching nothing be done, you know, for four years about an open border -- and I think that actually pushed me further to the right to want more law and order, to want stricter borders, and to want more control over this country.

KING: Back in 2024, Donald Trump won 94 of Iowa's 99 counties, so it is a steep climb for the Democrats. But Iowa is a fascinating midterm test. Do the suburbs swing back the Democrats' way like they did in 2018? And critical in Iowa and elsewhere, can Democrats finally claw their way back to be a little bit more competitive in those critical rural areas. That's the big test in Iowa and elsewhere.

Back to you.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

KATE BOLDUAN, CNN ANCHOR: John King, thank you so much.

And joining us right now to talk about it all, former Republican governor of New Hampshire, Chris Sununu. It's good to see you.

CHRIS SUNUNU, (R) FORMER GOVERNOR OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, PRESIDENT AND CEO, AIRLINES FOR AMERICA: Good to see you.

BOLDUAN: Thanks for being here.

SUNUNU: You bet.

BOLDUAN: Let's talk about Greenland. I actually looked way back in the way back machine. Right after -- right -- January 2025 you were on talking to John and you were talking about Greenland because that was when Trump really started talking about wanting to -- once again to take it back -- to take it. And you -- like many elected at the time, you said it was kind of Trump being tongue-in-cheek. You did not take him seriously that he really was serious about this Greenland thing.

And what do you think now?

SUNUNU: Oh, he's serious. Yeah, he's serious. Look, I think a lot -- you know, one thing with the president -- I think we understand where a lot of the means are. Is Greenland important? Yes. Is it a strategic asset? Yes.

BOLDUAN: Um-hum.

SUNUNU: Is it at risk with Russia and China? Yes. So should we do more there to secure that? Absolutely.

But with the president a lot of us say well, what are the methods here? Are we going to have military action? No, I don't -- I think as was reported just now. I don't think military action is the answer. I don't think that's where it's going.

But like everything with the president we're here. He's going to start negotiating up here. He's going to go to the -- kind of the most extreme and try to find some sort of middle ground. He'll go to Europe. He'll talk to NATO. They'll find some sort of middle ground and have -- the hope is I think America has a little more of a flag planted there in some form and do it in a way that maybe traditionally a lot of us wouldn't go about it.

[07:40:00]

But the ends are there. The means are there. We have to actually make sure that we secure Greenland. There's no question about that.

BOLDUAN: The thing about it now is it seems that it's kind of in a spiral in terms of what this desire for Greenland is doing to America -- relationships with America's closest allies.

Here is the lead graph of a Wall Street Journal piece that caught my eye today. "President Trump's demands that Denmark hand over Greenland to the U.S. or risk a trade war and possible military action is confronting Europe with the unthinkable: Its major ally for more than 70 years has turned into one of its most urgent threats."

That doesn't sound good.

SUNUNU: No, it -- you know, it reminds me of when the tariff stuff started, right? Oh, we're going to have a tariff war with our -- with our friends in Europe and all of that sort of thing. And all of a sudden --

BOLDUAN: It was not good.

SUNUNU: Yeah.

BOLDUAN: It has -- it did not go well. He backtracked on a ton of it. A lot --

SUNUNU: On the tariff side.

BOLDUAN: But a lot -- yeah.

SUNUNU: Yeah.

BOLDUAN: And a lot of those deals are still unclear. So what the point of it was and what he got out of it, the jury really still out on that one.

SUNUNU: Well, on the tariff side, I think we're in a very good place with Europe. There's no question about that.

BOLDUAN: Do you think that --

SUNUNU: He starts here, right, as you said, and he doesn't start out well. It starts with a lot of panic and all of that. It ends up back to where we want to be. It's zero for zero tariffs and a lot of it.

BOLDUAN: Do you think -- do you think -- do you think triggering a new chapter in a trade war is --

SUNUNU: Oh, awful. No.

BOLDUAN: -- worthy of this?

SUNUNU: No, no, no -- absolutely not.

And again, that's where the methods and the strategy and everything -- a lot of people are going to question that. The goal is there, right?

BOLDUAN: Um-hum.

SUNUNU: How we get there -- the president has his own path of getting there. You want to -- hopefully, the team will surround himself -- will surround the president -- Rubio, Scott Bessent. All the right people will be in the room to make sure we negotiate something that gets us where we need to be without military action and a lot of the extremism that you see. A lot of the rhetoric.

BOLDUAN: So you think -- you see an off-ramp where a lot of people --

SUNUNU: Of course.

BOLDUAN: -- see a collision course.

SUNUNU: Absolutely. There's always an off-ramp, right? We talk -- every time the president moves forward, we're always talking about -- we get tied up in the moment of his transaction. The moment of his negotiation. But at the end of the day most of the stuff gets to where it needs to be.

We -- again, not necessarily the path that a lot of us would take in terms of diplomacy and --

BOLDUAN: Right.

SUNUNU: -- and strategy, but it's the end that we're trying to get to.

BOLDUAN: So taking a look back on Capitol Hill right now there was -- there -- they seem to be inching towards possibly another partial government shutdown. I saw some reporting this morning that they may have actually just released a -- some kind of compromising.

SUNUNU: We're close.

BOLDUAN: It might be -- there is something --

SUNUNU: Yes.

BOLDUAN: -- that could be there there.

And so this also rings -- you know, if this gets up against a deadline, we're going to hear things like we need to get our fiscal house in order. We are bankrupting our children's future.

SUNUNU: Oh, yeah.

BOLDUAN: All the things we hear every time, which then reminds me of something I've been dying to ask a Republican since last week was the headline that got no attention. The rebranding of the Department of Defense -- it's to now be called the Department of War -- according to the CBO, could cost as much as $125 million just to rebrand it.

They -- the estimate adds that if Congress joins the Pentagon and statutorily changes the department's name it could then move into the hundreds of millions --

SUNUNU: Sure.

BOLDUAN: -- of dollars.

Money well spent?

SUNUNU: No. Look, I'm a fiscal conservative. I hate all that nonsense. To spend all this money on changing letterhead and changing names and titles, I could care less about all that to be honest.

But the appropriations -- let's get to the real thing that scares me. The appropriations have to move forward. If they don't move forward in the next two weeks we're facing another government shutdown.

I represent the airlines now. We saw what happened --

BOLDUAN: Um-hum.

SUNUNU: -- with the airlines back in the fall where it went six weeks and Democrats were about to say hey, we're about to cancel, you know, Thanksgiving travel. We got this close. Thank goodness Senators Hassan and Shaheen stepped up and kind of led the charge --

BOLDUAN: Um-hum.

SUNUNU: -- and made sure that enough Democrats got on board. We're this close to that happening again. It's something we're watching very closely.

Over the next couple of days if this appropriations bill moves forward with transportation and the right pieces are in it and they get it passed, we'll get there. But do we really have to wait until the last week? Every single --

BOLDUAN: Something I've been --

SUNUNU: Every few months? It's actually crazy. It's just crazy.

BOLDUAN: Something I've been -- do you mean the question that reporters have been asking for, I don't know, I've covered Congress for --

SUNUNU: Yeah.

BOLDUAN: -- 20 years now.

SUNUNU: Look, I'm passionate. I think it's very simple.

BOLDUAN: Yes, because they need a deadline. That is the answer.

SUNUNU: Yeah, or just pass a balanced budget and not have to go through this kind of, you know, piecing it together with duct tape and string every few months.

BOLDUAN: But Governor, you've been out of politics far too long now. It's far too long.

SUNUNU: It's how we do it in New Hampshire.

BOLDUAN: Far too long. What is it, you've been out politics now for a few months/ SUNUNU: Uh --

BOLDUAN: Yeah, far too long to know how this works.

SUNUNU: Yeah. I'm in D.C. now though. So now that I'm in D.C. maybe I'm getting Washingtonized and I don't even know it.

BOLDUAN: You do. Are starting to look slightly swampy.

It's good to see you. Thank you for coming in.

SUNUNU: You bet.

BOLDUAN: Appreciate it -- John.

BERMAN: The potential future governor-general of Greenland right there.

BOLDUAN: You are the general of the Greenland.

SUNUNU: I'll create the job.

BERMAN: New details this morning of a deadly train collision in Spain that killed at least 40 people and injured dozens more. A preliminary report shows the tail end of a northbound train derailed and crossed into the adjacent track. It hit the front end of a southbound train sending it down an embankment. Both trains overturned and both trains were going under the speed limit. And what's more, all this happened on a straightaway -- a straight portion of the track.

[07:45:00]

CNN's Pau Mosquera is near the crash site in Spain with the very latest. What are you hearing this morning, Pau?

PAU MOSQUERA, CNN CORRESPONDENT: Well John, the very latest that we know is that now Spain's authorities' main priority is to try to clarify the cause -- the origin of this deadly train crash. So far, we know that in over the next hours they will be sending to a laboratory in Madrid a section of the track and the wheels of one of the trains to better determine if there was any damage prior to that crash.

Also, we know that King Felipe and Queen Letizia will travel here to Cordoba to learn more about the investigation, about the accident, and to also meet with some of the families that actually are inside of the community center that you can see here behind me.

You may see some ambulances and some police, and this is because they are offering here inside some psychological support. And also, in all the cases that they have some data, they are giving them information about those that are still missing, John.

BERMAN: Pau, again, so many questions still about what caused this crash. No obvious clues yet. Thank you so much for being there so close to scene -- appreciate it -- Sara.

SIDNER: A really terrifying scene there.

And ahead, a judge and his wife shot in broad daylight at their home. This morning, there is an urgent manhunt for the shooter.

Also, Trump's Greenland talk causing jitters on Wall Street. Market futures reacting to President Trump's growing tensions with European allies over Greenland.

(COMMERCIAL)

[07:51:17]

SIDNER: Breaking this morning, if you look at futures when that bell rings this morning on Wall Street this won't be pretty. U.S. stocks expected to fall sharply as investors wring their hands over the president's clash with European leaders over Greenland and, of course, the threat of tariffs. The so-called "fear gauge" is surging. European markets, by the way, are also lower this morning.

Matt Egan is tracking all of this and is here with me now. It's never good when the fear gauge goes up and this isn't looking so great this morning.

MATT EGAN, CNN SENIOR REPORTER: Yeah, Sara, look, here we go again, right? Trade war fears are once again rocking financial markets; except this time it's not about a fight with China; it's about a fight with U.S. allies standing in the way of the president's quest to try to take over Greenland.

Look at U.S. stock futures. As you mentioned, Dow futures down by almost 600 points, about 1.2 percent. Steeper losses of 1.6 percent for the Nasdaq. We do have all these different signs of fear that are piling up. You mentioned the fear gauge spiking by almost 30 percent.

Gold and silver, the precious metals -- investors are rushing into the safety and gold and silver. Both of them are surging this morning. You can see gold up another --

SIDNER: Wow.

EGAN: -- three percent. Silver, almost eight percent higher.

Now, this is the market basically giving two thumbs down to the president's plan to slap tariffs on U.S. allies, right? Over the weekend the president says he's going to put this 10 percent tariff on eight different European nations, including the U.K., Denmark, Germany, and France. Now that's starting February 1. And he says that the tariffs are basically going to more than double if there's no agreement on Greenland by June 1.

Now this is rattling investors because a lot of people had been thinking or maybe hoping that the worst on the trade front and trade tensions was over. Clearly, it's not. I mean, a lot of investors have got to be thinking we need this like a hole in the head, right? We have inflation that's stubbornly high.

SIDNER: Right.

EGAN: The job market is already cracking, Fed independence is under attack, and now investors have to sort of game out what happens next on the trade front. And the risk is that these European countries that now face this tariff in the coming days or weeks from the president -- that they retaliate aggressively. And you could have a situation where there's a tit-for-tat situation where each side keeps retaliating and it's really the economy and the people that really lose out.

Uh, now I -- one analyst who is on the more optimistic side, Dan Ives -- he's a tech analyst who is super bullish. He thinks that maybe the bark will be worse than the bite here --

SIDNER: Um-hum.

EGAN: -- and that this could be a buying opportunity. And that's what happened last April when the president threatened those massive tariffs and then he ended up blinking --

SIDNER: Right.

EGAN: -- because of market pressure.

SIDNER: Right, and we will see if this has an impact also on the president. It goes both ways.

EGAN: Yeah.

SIDNER: But this is of his own making at this point in time.

EGAN: Yeah.

SIDNER: We will see what happens.

Matt Egan, it is a pleasure. Thank you so much.

EGAN: Thank you, Sara.

SIDNER: Kate.

BOLDUAN: Also this morning, an urgent manhunt is underway in Indiana. Police say someone shot and wounded a state court judge and his wife in their home. This attack happening in broad daylight Sunday.

According to 911 dispatch audio, the suspect knocked on the door and then shot through the door hitting Judge Steven Meyer in the arm and his wife, Kimberly, in the hip. Listen to this.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

911 DISPATCH: There was a knock on the door, and someone advised, "We have your dog," and then a shot came through the door. He was shot through the arm, and they don't know who shot him.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

BOLDUAN: The judge and his wife are both said to be in stable condition this morning, fortunately.

Joining us right is Chris Swecker, the former assistant director of the FBI's Criminal Investigative Division. Chris, it's good to see you again. Thanks for coming back in.

[07:55:00]

As they search for this --

CHRIS SWECKER, FORMER ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, FBI'S CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIVE DIVISION: Good morning.

BOLDUAN: -- suspect now, what details do you think -- and there -- it's slim on details coming out right now. What details do you think work in their -- to their advantage and what facts are working against them as this -- as this is underway?

SWECKER: Yeah. I mean, clearly, this is a -- I hate to all it an amateur shooting, but this is obviously not well planned out. I mean, they shot through the door. The judge is -- the judge and his wife were both injured but not seriously and not grievously. But it was -- you know, the incident is bad enough.

This -- so -- that -- I think the method that -- you know, the way this went down, I think it suggests that his person is pretty erratic. I think they're on the run. You know, they're obviously on the run but they're going to get caught very quickly because I just don't see this as having been really well planned out.

So, you know, manhunts are -- in urban areas are always a problem because there's that danger that they panic and they carjack or invade someone's home and take a hostage. So that's the worst-case scenario. And I'm sure it's a full-court press for all law enforcement, including the Feds and the locals.

BOLDUAN: Yeah. And, of course, adding into this is, as I said, this is a judge. This is a state court judge and that has -- obviously, that brings up additional questions of what to look for in the past cases that the judge has overseen. Any issues when it comes to -- comes to what he's -- as he's been a judge for many years -- what that means.

How does -- how do you -- how do you delve into that when you're trying to investigate this and search for possible suspects?

SWECKER: Right. Yeah, different teams will be having -- will have different assignments here. And obviously, analysts and agents will be going through that -- his caseload, past and present. Were there any threats?

Recently, you know, a law was passed that would create a judicial threat center that would analyze threats across all the states. So, you know, that's not in effect yet. Too bad it's not.

Um, you know, there -- we live in the age of cameras and video, and I think that it would be difficult to conceive that there aren't some Ring cameras in the area and around the house. And if there isn't, I think the silence that's coming from law enforcement right now is a good indication that they don't need the public's help yet. They have some hot leads. Once they come out with some information and start posting photos, that means they're -- you know, they're going to need some help from the general public. Right now, it doesn't appear that they need it, so they're hot on the trail here.

BOLDUAN: That is exactly what I was going to ask you because it's unclear if they have a description of a suspect. The fact though that the police have not -- again, I said this happened on Sunday. They haven't put out a description. They haven't said that they're necessarily looking for the public's help to track down someone of this, you know, description. That suggests to you that they may have -- they may have more than they are letting on.

SWECKER: Right. Like, the Brown shooting, I said very early on if you get a vehicle, if you get a car tag, then you're well on your way to the apprehension. You know, first is identifying the person and then the apprehension.

So I think it's a clear tell here that the -- that there's no information coming from law enforcement, so they're on it right now. And then we've got license tag readers all over the place. Officers on the street. I think it's -- I think by the end of the day -- I hate to make predictions, but I think we'll be very close to an apprehension here.

BOLDUAN: Yeah, for that family and for that -- for that judge, for his wife, and for their family and that entire neighborhood. It's a neighborhood that's -- the way I saw it, it was about 10 minutes from Purdue University's campus. So there's a lot of people who are looking for this to get solved very, very quickly.

Thanks so much, Chris -- John.

BERMAN: All right. New this morning police in Australia are trying to find out if a woman who was found dead at a beach was killed by dingoes -- the native wild dogs there. Officials say the woman was Canadian and had been working at a backpacker hostile on an island off Australia's coast.

Police say she told people she was going for an early-morning swim. An hour later witnesses say a pack of about 10 dingoes surrounding her body. Dingoes are a protected native species in national parks there. Police say it's too early to know if they killed her.

In Virginia Beach -- talk about right place, right time. A lunching Navy rescue swimmer pulled a woman who was drowning potentially in her vehicle.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Hey! Go to the back! Go to the back!

(END VIDEO CLIP)

BERMAN: Jeremy Way said he was eating lunch in a restaurant patio when he heard a loud crash. The car had driven off a boat ramp. Way and three other people were able to break the glass of the sinking car and pull the woman to safety. That driver is recovering at a local hospital.

England, this morning, in major need of a catsup delivery or maybe vinegar because that's what they put on fries there, strangely enough. Fries covering a beach after a container ship spilled its cargo.